Bank Account Freelancing

A Florida man admitted creating $14 million in fake checks, because apparently “unauthorized debit” needed a small-business model

The Justice Department says Eri Guzman Ortiz used lists of thousands of people and businesses to create fraudulent checks that moved money into sham-company accounts. He pleaded guilty to wire fraud and faces up to 20 years in prison.

What Happened

Eri Guzman Ortiz, 69, formerly of Miami-Dade County, pleaded guilty to wire fraud after admitting that he created and deposited about $14 million in fraudulent checks, according to the Justice Department. The checks were used to transfer money from victims’ bank accounts to accounts belonging to sham companies without authorization.

The scheme was not based on one spectacular bank robbery or a mysterious suitcase of cash. It was paperwork: fraudulent checks, fake companies, lists of names, and the hope that enough transactions would look ordinary long enough for the money to move.

Ortiz is scheduled to be sentenced Nov. 5 and faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison. A judge will determine the sentence after considering federal guidelines and other statutory factors.

The List Was the Business Plan

According to court documents, a client in Canada sent Ortiz lists containing thousands of people and businesses that had supposedly made purchases from sham companies and agreed to let those companies debit their bank accounts.

The people and businesses had not made those purchases and had not authorized the debits. Ortiz allegedly used the lists to create checks and deposit them into sham-company accounts anyway. It was a fake transaction assembled from real names, because the modern scam economy has discovered the efficiency of outsourcing the “who are you?” part.

The Justice Department says the result was money taken from victims’ accounts without their permission. The name on the list made the transaction appear more plausible; the authorization did not exist.

Why Checks?

Checks are old technology, but old technology is not automatically harmless technology. A check can still move money, and fraudulent checks can exploit the gap between when funds appear available and when a bank fully detects the problem.

The scheme also shows why business-looking paperwork can be dangerous. A sham company, a purchase list and a check can resemble routine commerce if nobody stops to ask whether the customer actually bought anything. Fraud does not always arrive wearing a ski mask. Sometimes it arrives with an invoice and a company name that sounds like it was generated by a naming consultant.

The Dumb Part

The dumb part is the ambition. Creating about $14 million in fraudulent checks requires a level of organization that could have been used for almost anything else. There were lists to process, shell accounts to maintain, checks to create and transfers to coordinate. The scheme apparently turned “I need your bank information” into an operations department.

It is also a reminder that the victim may not know the sham company at all. The person whose money moved did not have to click a suspicious link or agree to a strange subscription. Their name appeared on someone else’s list, and that was treated as permission by people who knew it was not.

The Investigation

The U.S. Postal Inspection Service and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s Office of Inspector General are investigating the case. Prosecutors from the Justice Department’s Fraud Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida are handling the matter.

Ortiz pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud. The guilty plea resolves his criminal responsibility for that count, while the sentencing judge will decide the punishment and any related financial consequences.

The Bottom Line

A Florida man admitted using lists of thousands of people and businesses to create roughly $14 million in fraudulent checks for sham companies. The scam was not high-tech theater. It was ordinary financial machinery used with extraordinary dishonesty. If your bank statement contains a debit from a company you have never heard of, “it was on a list” is not a valid authorization.

Sources

U.S. Department of Justice: Florida man pleads guilty in $14 million check scheme

DOJ: Fraud Division enforcement actions


← Back to scam watch