Your Data Has a Price Tag

The FTC is asking whether companies should disclose personalized prices, because apparently the checkout page can now size you up like a casino

The Federal Trade Commission is seeking comment on a proposed enforcement policy addressing personalized pricing, in which businesses use personal data to estimate what an individual consumer may be willing to pay.

What Happened

The FTC says personalized pricing uses personal data to set a price based on what a company believes a particular consumer is willing to spend. On August 19, the agency opened a public comment process for an enforcement policy statement about the practice.

That is a polite government sentence for a fairly impolite retail experience: two people look at the same product, and the website quietly decides which one appears more desperate, distracted, loyal, wealthy or bad at closing browser tabs.

Why It Matters

Businesses have always charged different prices in different places and under different conditions. The FTC’s concern is the hidden use of personal information to make those decisions. Data about a shopper can be used to infer willingness to pay without the shopper ever seeing the calculation or knowing that the number was personalized.

The agency says the policy would address deceptive or unfair conduct, including misrepresentations about how prices are set and the use of sensitive data in ways that harm consumers. The proposal is not a final finding that every personalized price is illegal. It is the FTC asking for comments before deciding how to police the practice.

The Dumb Part With the Algorithm

There is something uniquely modern about being charged extra because a spreadsheet thinks you have the emotional profile of a person who will click “Buy Now” anyway. The store does not have to insult you directly. It can simply watch you search, wait, compare, return and come back at 11:47 p.m. with the price it thinks will end the conversation.

The old haggler at least had the decency to make eye contact. The new one is a silent prediction model with access to your browsing history.

Transparency matters because a consumer cannot challenge a price she cannot see being calculated. If a seller says a price is based on inventory or time-limited demand, that is different from quietly using personal data to guess the maximum extraction point for one specific person.

The Bottom Line

The FTC is soliciting public comments, not announcing a universal ban. But the agency has put the retail industry on notice that “the computer made me do it” may not be a complete defense when the computer is using personal information to pick someone’s wallet.

Sources

FTC: FTC Seeks Comment on Enforcement Policy Statement Regarding Personalized Pricing

FTC legal library: Proposed Enforcement Policy Statement Regarding Personalized Pricing


← Back to Government Nonsense